Real & Complex Projective Space (Part 2)
We can now move on to talk about Complex Projective Space, using some of the intuition we built in the real case. Define the equivalence relation on
, so that
if
with
. Then define
. We can still think of
as the space of complex lines through the origin in
, but because multiplication by complex numbers “rotate” as well as “scale,” it’s not quite as easy to see what’s going on here.
In this post, we will prove a number of nice topological properties about , and in the last post we will attempt a simple study of its structure, introducing important examples.
1. is compact.
Let . This is the
-dimensional complex sphere. Next, define the projection map
. Note that for every non-zero vector
in
there is (at least one) scalar
such that
. Thus, every equivalence class intersects the complex
-sphere at least once. In fact, they intersect the complex sphere in many different places, so it isn’t a transversal.
As a result, we can see that . Since
is compact, and
is continuous (by the construction of the quotient space), so is
.
2. is open.
It will suffice to show that (the equivalence class of
) is open for any open
. This is because
is open iff
is open (by the construction of the quotient topology), and
. Write
.
is open, so
is the union of open sets, and hence is open itself.
Before we move on, we need to prove two simple theorems about quotient spaces.
Theorem 1: Let be a topological space and let
be an equivalence relation on
. Let
be the projection map. A function
from
to a topological space
is continuous if and only if
is continuous.
Proof: Since the composition of continuous functions is continuous, the continuity of $f$ implies the continuity of . Conversely, if
is continuous, let
be an open subset of
. Then
is an open subset of
. By the definition of the quotient topology,
is an open subset of
. Thus
is continuous.
Theorem 2: Let be a continuous function form a topological space
to a topological space
. Let
be an equivalence relation on
such that
is constant on each equivalence class. Then there exists a continuous function
such that
.
Proof: Consider the following diagram.
Define the value of on an equivalence class to be the value of
at any element of the equivalence class. Then
is well defined and
. The continuity of
follows from Theorem 1.
3.The equivalence of with
.
Define on
as follows:
if
and
. Let
be the natural projection map. We want to show that
. By Theorem 2, we need to construct a map from
to
that respects
.
Observe that is a bijection, as
iff
. By construction,
is continuous. We want to show it is open, and hence a homeomorphism. We know that
is open iff
is open in
. To see that
is open, note that
is open iff
is open in
, which is true iff
is open.
Hence, it will suffice to show that if is relatively open, so is
. To show this, construct a map
by
. This map normalizes a vector, sending it to sphere. Note that
is continuous, so that if
is open,
is open. But
, so we are done.
4. is Hausdorff.
We will work in , identifying
with
. Let
such that
. Let
and
. Then
. Moreover,
and
are closed, hence compact. Let
be the distance between
and
, and define
and
. These are the equivalence classes of open balls around
and
in
, and are open themselves.
We claim that . Suppose, to the contrary, that
. Then
with
and
. Similarly,
with
and
.
This contradicts the fact that is the infimum of the distances between points in
and
.
By construction, , both are open, and
and
, so
is Hausdorff.
.
In summary, we have shown that complex projective space is compact and hausdorff, and the projection map is a homeomorphism. Moreover, we can study complex projective space by working only with a quotient space of the complex sphere, which is simpler to work with.
Posted on December 26, 2011, in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink. Leave a Comment.
Leave a Comment
Comments (0)